FBI threatens Q

The above recording documents an illegal threat issued to Q by some unidentified FBI operative after Q sent an email blast to NYPD Detectives reporting upon serious federal scandals. The NYPD respond to the same email by instead asking Q to continue to update them with email blasts. So which one is it? Shut up and be quiet, or send out more email blasts? The background of these contradictory communications are as follows:

On 8/3/2022, Q sent an email to Keechant L. Sewell (Police Commissioner of the NYPD) & Eric Adams (Mayor of New York City) to report crimes committed by FBI since before 911 (through NYPD Detective intermediaries that make it impossible for them to deny knowledge of the report - unredacted version available upon request):

The FBI responds to the email by having Q's girlfriend's home in Florida raided on 8/5/2022 to conduct an illegal "threat assessment" based upon nothing more than Q's request to speak to NYPD about prior crimes he witnessed. Q's girlfriend was present to witness the entire incident (and was also illegally interrogated). When Q asked the FBI henchmen to identify just one statement in his email to NYPD that was being considered a "threat," they stated that the specific portion of the email where Q discloses he brought justice to a criminal pedophile in Morocco in 2007 was being considered a possible illegal threat to all current pedophiles who fear that Q will do that to them in the future. USA v. Stock 728 F.3d 287 (3rd Cir. 2013), and USA v. Landham, 251 F.3d 1072 (6th CIr. 2001) confirms a statement about past conduct cannot constitute a threat (only claim of present or future conduct can constitute a threat). Q merely stating a fact that he administered justice upon a criminal pedophile in 2007 (pursuant to Abrahamic law) cannot constitute a threat to commit any future violent crime. If such claims by FBI were true, a military veteran cannot even tell people he fought and killed in Iraq to defend his country as such a statement would be defined as an "illegal threat to engage present or future killing." The completely lawful email to Mayor Adams set into motion a series of actions (and counter-actions) which led to Trump's Wac-O-Lago bunker being raided by FBI the next day on 8/8/2022.

This recording is just one of hundreds of similar illegal threats issued against Q by the FBI since immediately following the 911 attacks when Q first attempted to report these crimes and was blocked by DEA, FBI and CIA. For example, from 2011-2012 Q was receiving threats from Al-Qaeda that they were going to abandon the ceasefire agreement unless he travelled to Saudi Arabia to "keep up appearances" after the FBI provoked a conflict between Q and his family's government in Morocco. The FBI was still obstructing investigation of their rogue 911 operative in Pakistan, so Q sent emails to select feds to break the obstruction and they replied by threatening to kill him (Q ended up restraining the threat without FBI assistance - here is the email documenting the exchange):

Even when Q submits these FBI threats to the federal courts to have them restrained (as he did with the above threat from October 26th, 2011), at least one federal judge (Mark Kearney) responded with a bizarre ruling alleging that it was legal for the feds to threaten violence against Q because he is not a federal official, but it is illegal for Q to respond to them in kind (because they are federal officials).